Skip to content
Statistics

Subsystem comparisons

Twelve subsystem chapters, eleven of them backed by a dedicated study, describe the same rover from twelve directions. Put side by side, they answer a different question from any one of them: which boundaries carry the system. The arm, compute and perception each touch nine high-criticality interfaces, the wheels are 24 % of the one measured mass breakdown, and the arm spans 4.0× in published mass, from 3.53 kg to 14.00 kg. This page is the comparison table set, with the numbers and the page that derives each one.

12Subsystems comparedTwelve chapters, eleven dedicated studies2027
66Interfaces between them37 high, 25 medium, 4 low2027
9High interfaces on the armCompute and perception also nine2027
24 %Wheels’ share of measured massThe largest item in Monash’s record2026S-MONASH-GH-NOVA

Key takeaways

  • The arm and compute are the most coupled subsystems. Nine high-criticality interfaces each. A first build that leaves the arm last and chooses cameras as it goes has chosen the two worst places to defer decisions.
  • No single subsystem dominates the mass. Monash’s measured chassis is 24 % wheels, 22 % suspension, 18 % chassis, 14 % ankles, 21 % arm. A 50 kg rover is five or six decisions of 5 to 8 kg.
  • The arm is the widest discretionary item. Independent measurements run from 3.53 kg to 14.00 kg for 0.87 to 1.17 m of reach, a 4.0× spread on the same requirement.
  • Power and environment touch everything. Every power interface except one is electrical, and a single E-stop rule makes power a system function rather than a subsystem.

The twelve subsystems on one page

The sizing number is the value each study uses to close its design. The mass figures are the published ranges from the mass model.

# Subsystem The number that sizes it Typical mass High interfaces Detail
01 Mobility 7.72 N·m per wheel at 30° for a 45 kg rover 14–29 kg (28–58 %) 7 Mobility
02 Arm and end-effectors 233 N·m static and 176 N·m peak at the shoulder; 0.87–1.17 m reach 6–14 kg (12–28 %) 9 Arm and end-effectors
03 Science payload 3.5–4.5 kg for a two-assay payload; 30–100 W drill 3.5–6 kg (8–15 %) 5 Science and astrobiology
04 Delivery and drones 5 kg objects at 40 × 40 × 40 cm, grasp within 7.5 cm Mission, not a subsystem 1 Delivery and drones
05 Communications 12–200 kbps at 900 MHz; 6 Mbps at 2.62 km on 2.4 GHz 3–5 kg with compute 7 Communications
06 Power and electrical safety 120 A drive peak and 1.1 kW arm peak; 249 W average 4–6 kg (8–12 %) 6 Power and safety
07 Compute and perception 10–40 W compute; 3–11 cameras; ArUco at 10–30 Hz 3–5 kg with comms 9 Compute and perception
08 Software and autonomy 100–200 Hz joint loop; telemetry at 2 Hz or more in 2 kB messages No mass 6 Software and autonomy
09 Operations Six command seats; 15 minutes to set up, 10 to tear down Ground station, not rover 6 Operations
10 Systems and integration 37.5 kg allocation plus 15 % growth, 43.1 kg; 1.2 m cube Owns the allocation 7 Systems engineering
11 Environment and repair 37.8 °C; 65 km/h gust to 155 Pa; 10 g transport shock Imposes mass, owns none 7 Environment and repair
12 Astronaut interaction 50 points; 3 m stand-off; stay test beyond 20 m Suit is not rover mass 4 Astronaut interaction

The 1.2 m cube and the 50 kg limit are fixed by the rules S-URC27-RULES S-URC27-RULES §2.a §1; the 5 kg and 40 × 40 × 40 cm delivery objects and the 50 astronaut points are fixed by the missions S-URC27-RULES §1. The arm masses are five independent published values, from Cornell at 3.53 kg to ARES at 14.00 kg S-WVU-SAR2025 S-ARES-PAPER-2025 S-RSX-ARM-URDF S-MONASH-GH-NOVA, with the Cornell figure taken from the team description files listed in the mass and power data.

Mass shares

Subsystem Typical share of a 45–50 kg rover Evidence Confidence
Mobility 28–45 % (14–22 kg) Monash measured, plus allocations Medium
Arm 12–28 % (6–14 kg) Five independent published masses High
Science payload 8–15 % (3.5–6 kg) Two independent derivations Medium
Power 8–12 % (4–6 kg) 500–600 Wh at 170 Wh/kg plus electronics Medium
Compute, comms, antennas 6–10 % (3–5 kg) Module and camera masses Medium
Fasteners, brackets, cable 3–5 % Build experience Low

The mobility range widens to 14–29 kg and 28–58 % when every published and allocated estimate is included, which is the range used in the first table. The narrower 28–45 % band is the central estimate for a first build.

Subsystem shares of accounted mass for three allocations
Three allocations: Monash’s measured robot description, the systems-engineering worked allocation and the recommended 49 kg target. The Monash bar reads 79 % mobility only because battery, electronics and science are absent from its files; read its composition instead: wheels 24 %, suspension and ankles 36 %, arm 21 %. Samples: one measured CAD set and two allocations.Robotics Club @ Mississippi State University, 2026. Original analysis. S-MONASH-GH-NOVA Full resolution

The measured case and the two allocations bracket the same design, and their differences are instructive:

Subsystem Systems allocation Recommended target Why they differ
Mobility 14.0 kg (37 %) 15.0 kg (31 %) The allocation assumes 0.6 kg printed wheels; Monash’s real wheels are 1.85 kg each
Arm 9.5 kg (25 %) 8.0 kg (16 %) Bought integrated actuators land at 6–9 kg; three published arms are below 7 kg
Science 5.5 kg (15 %) 5.0 kg (10 %) An independent derivation gives 3.5–4.5 kg
Power 4.0 kg (11 %) 5.0 kg (10 %) A 500 Wh pack is about 2.9 kg plus distribution and harness
Compute, comms, fasteners 4.5 kg (12 %) 4.0 kg (8 %) One computer, six to eleven cameras, three radios
Reserve 0 kg 12.0 kg (24 %) The allocation recovers margin by adding 15 % growth; the target carries the reserve explicitly
Total 37.5 kg 49.0 kg One is a pre-growth estimate, the other a design target

Interfaces by subsystem

The matrix has 66 interfaces between the twelve subsystems, every pair has at least one, and 37 are high criticality, 25 medium and 4 low. The degree of a subsystem is the count of high-criticality interfaces it touches, and it is the best available proxy for where a late change propagates.

Subsystem High interfaces What it means for a schedule
Compute and perception 9 Perception is the most coupled data subsystem
Arm 9 The arm is the most coupled mechanical subsystem
Environment 7 Thermal and dust touch every sealed box
Systems 7 Every allocation is an interface
Communications 7 The link is a system property, not a radio choice
Mobility 7 The deck, the cube and the mass budget all run through it
Operations 6 Clocks convert into points
Software 6 Data and timing cross most boundaries
Power 6 Every power interface except the thermal one is electrical
Science 5 Mostly mechanical and data, one timing link
Astronaut 4 Data and timing dominated
Delivery 1 Delivery re-uses existing interfaces; its risk is in the mission sequence

The full network and the criticality definitions are on Failures and interfaces. Two cells are deliberately not high: the astronaut camera link is worth 5 points and changes nothing else, and the power-to-systems link is the mass allocation rather than a physical boundary.

The values on this page

Statistic Value Definition Period Sample Source Chart and chapter
Subsystems 12 Chapters in the subsystem set 2027 12 chapters Analysis Subsystem studies
Interfaces 66 Pairs across twelve subsystems 2027 12 × 12 matrix Analysis Failures and interfaces
High interfaces 37 Interfaces that force a redesign or cost 10 points 2027 66 interfaces Analysis Failures and interfaces
Most coupled 9 each Arm and compute and perception 2027 66 interfaces Analysis Interfaces and couplings
Mobility mass 14–29 kg Published and allocated range 2021–2026 8 teams S-MONASH-GH-NOVA Mobility
Arm mass 3.53–14.00 kg Five independent published values 2025–2026 5 teams S-WVU-SAR2025 Arm and end-effectors

Evidence note

The mass shares rest on one measured CAD breakdown, one worked allocation and one recommended target, not on a statistical sample. The interface counts are exact for the matrix as written and are only as good as the twelve studies behind it; the delivery node is the weakest, because it has no dedicated study and is reconstructed from the rules and the other chapters. The failure record is counted on the next page.

Sources for this page

  1. S-URC27-RULESUniversity Rover Challenge 2027 – Requirements and GuidelinesThe Mars Society / URC.Original Archived copy
  2. S-WVU-SAR2025Team Mountaineers System Acceptance Review 2025 (rover "Daedalus"): 2.4 GHz 90° sector + 3 m rover mast, 70 cm HAM packet radios, 433.25 MHz amateur-TV analog video, 750 m LOSWVU Team Mountaineers, 2025.Original
  3. S-ARES-PAPER-2025"Development of a Multifunctional Rover System for Mars Exploration and Operations in the University Rover Challenge" (RSJ 2024, 2K2-07)ARES Project (Keio Univ. et al.), 2024.Original
  4. S-RSX-ARM-URDFRSX 2025 arm URDF + meshes (6 revolute joints, link masses)University of Toronto Robotics for Space Exploration, 2025.Original
  5. S-MONASH-GH-NOVAMonashNovaRover/nova, "The Monash Nova Rover mono-repo" (Apache-2.0; default branch main; 2,389 files; last push 2026-10-23)Monash Nova Rover, 2024-09 → 2026-10 (repo life).Original