Carleton Planetary Robotics Team (CPRT)
Carleton is a science-first team with a specific published payload: a custom 785 nm Raman spectrometer built to detect carotenoids in Mars-analogue soil and field-tested at the Mars Desert Research Station. Across four finals the Science mission has never fallen below 77, and Delivery has never exceeded 28. The team is worth reading for how it chose a narrow biosignature target, and for what a decade of institutional history does and does not guarantee about continuity of entry.
What this team shows
- A narrow, hypothesis-driven instrument beats a broad one. The payload targets carotenoids specifically, at a wavelength picked for carbon bonds, rather than scanning for general mineralogy.
- The analysis chain, collect, prepare, measure and interpret, is where the science points are. Integration of sampling with real-time spectroscopy is the team’s stated differentiator.
- Science is stable and everything mechanical is not. Delivery across four finals is 15, 10, 28 and 8; autonomy is 0, 10, 25.2 and 0.
- Rank and total can move in opposite directions. The team finished 21st on 208.06 in 2026 after finishing 23rd on 232.15 in 2025.
Identity and results
The Carleton Planetary Robotics Team is based at Carleton University in Ottawa and splits its work across five subteams: mechanical, electrical, science, software, and business and administration S-CPRT-SITE. It competes at both the Canadian International Rover Challenge and the URC S-CPRT-SITE. The finals record spans 2018, 2019, 2025 and 2026, with registered but unscored seasons in 2022 and 2024 and no registration in 2023 S-URC22-TEAMS S-URC24-TEAMS S-URC23-TEAMS. Tier C is the census label for the two scored finals inside the 2022–2026 window; the tier rule is defined on the census page.
No rover name or generation history is published. The team’s rover section is image-only S-CPRT-SITE.
| Year | Rover | Total | Rank | Field | SAR | Science | Delivery | Equipment | Autonomy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | not published | 190.8 | 24 | 36 | 73.9 | 100 | 15 | 1.9 | 0 |
| 2019 | not published | 225.48 | 17 | 36 | 84.78 | 77 | 10 | 43.7 | 10 |
| 2025 | not published | 232.15 | 23 | 35 | 87.15 | 79 | 28 | 12.8 | 25.2 |
| 2026 | not published | 208.06 | 21 | 36 | 79.38 | 87 | 8 | 33.68 | 0 |
The 2018 and 2019 rows come from the archived official tables; the 2025 and 2026 rows come from the current score sheets S-URC-HISTRESULTS S-URC25-SCORES S-URC26-SCORES.
The rover and the science payload
The rover. Mass, wheel count, suspension type, arm degrees of freedom, battery, radio and on-board computer are all unpublished. What the team does state is the subteam scope: mechanical owns chassis, suspension and arm; electrical owns power, wiring and sensors; science analyses soil; software owns autonomy, vision and control S-CPRT-SITE. No design report and no public code archive were found.
The science payload. A sponsor case study published by the spectrometer supplier StellarNet describes the instrument in the team’s own words, so the claims below are reported rather than independently measured S-CPRT-STELLARNET:
- A custom Raman spectrometer intended to ride on the rover and search for signs of life.
- 785 nm laser excitation, chosen to target the high-energy carbon–carbon and carbon–hydrogen bonds, with a CCD detector and SpectraWizard acquisition software.
- A target analyte of carotenoids, organic molecules that occur only through biological processes, which makes the payload a biosignature detector rather than a mineralogy instrument.
- Spectra said to correspond to carbon–carbon and carbon–hydrogen bond vibrations from Mars-like soil, with field validation at the Mars Desert Research Station in Utah.
- The instrument is shown being lowered onto the rover, which implies a deployment mechanism rather than a fixed sensor.
The case study credits Milan Djordjevic, Emily Causi, Willow Cartwright and Jade Rempel-Facey by name S-CPRT-STELLARNET. It remains a supplier document, not a team report, which is the main limit on its evidence value.
Mission performance
2018, 24th of 36. A perfect Science score of 100 with Delivery at 15, Equipment at 1.9 and Autonomy at 0 S-URC-HISTRESULTS. A team that could do the science mission perfectly and nothing else.
2019, 17th of 36. The best finish in the team’s record: Science 77, Equipment 43.7, Delivery 10, Autonomy 10 S-URC-HISTRESULTS. All four mission families worked at once.
2025, 23rd of 35. The first season in the window with all four missions scored: Science 79, Delivery 28, Equipment 12.8, Autonomy 25.2 S-URC25-SCORES. A complete set of mid-field scores is a mid-field result.
2026, 21st of 36. Science 87, Equipment 33.68, Delivery 8, Autonomy 0, and a review score of 79.38 S-URC26-SCORES. Science and servicing improved while the two missions that need a rehearsed sequence collapsed, and the rank improved because the field moved further.
The pattern across four finals is consistent: Science 100, 77, 79 and 87 against Delivery 15, 10, 28 and 8 and Autonomy 0, 10, 25.2 and 0. The payload is the stable part of the rover.
Lessons for a first build
- Pick one biosignature and design the instrument around it. Targeting carotenoids at 785 nm is a hypothesis with a measurable answer, and it is cheaper to defend in a review than a general-purpose spectrometer with no analyte.
- Score the analysis chain, not the sensor. Collecting, preparing, measuring and interpreting is what the science mission rewards; the team’s stated differentiator was integrating sample collection with real-time spectroscopy, not the spectrometer alone.
- A complete mission set is a floor, not a result. 2025 had all four missions scoring and still finished 23rd. Balanced mid-field work does not move a team up; one mission family has to be strong.
- Plan the second season while the first is running. Two registered seasons produced no score row and one season was not registered at all, after a decade of near-continuous review submissions S-CPRT-YT. Institutional history does not guarantee continuity of entry.
- Publish a two-page payload note. The best engineering evidence for this team was written by its spectrometer supplier, not by the team S-CPRT-STELLARNET. Two pages of the team’s own method would be more useful and more durable.
What remains uncertain
The rover’s name and generation history are not published. Mass, dimensions, wheel and suspension type, arm degrees of freedom, end effector, battery, radios and on-board computer are all unknown. Why the 2022 and 2024 seasons ended before the score sheet, and why 2023 was skipped, is not stated. Why Autonomy fell from 25.2 to 0 between 2025 and 2026 while Science rose from 79 to 87 has no public explanation. Whether the Raman instrument flown in 2026 is the same one the 2025 case study describes is also unknown.
Team sources
- curover.ca, the team site, with the five subteams, the competitions and the image-only rover section.
- carleton.ca/cprt, the university-hosted copy of the same content.
- CPRT on YouTube, the System Acceptance Review films from 2017 to 2026.
- University Rover Challenge, the competition whose official score sheets carry the results above.
Sources for this page
- S-CPRT-SITECPRT site (same content at curover.ca and carleton.ca/cprt), five subteams (Mechanical / Electrical / Science / Software / Business & Administration), CIRC + URC, "Our Rovers" section with no textOriginal
- S-URC22-TEAMSURC2022 Team List ("URC2022 Featured 99 Teams, 15 Countries")Original
- S-URC24-TEAMSURC2024 Team ListOriginal
- S-URC23-TEAMSURC2023 Team ListOriginal
- S-URC-HISTRESULTSURC results database: derived 2022–2026 statistics (§4–§5) and archived official results 2013–2019 (§7)Print copy
- S-URC25-SCORESURC2025 Official ScoresOriginal
- S-URC26-SCORESURC2026 Official ScoresOriginal Archived copy
- S-CPRT-STELLARNET"DIY Science for Planetary Discovery", StellarNet 2025 Spectroscopy Challenge winner feature on CPRT's Raman payload (785 nm laser, CCD, SpectraWizard, carotenoid target, MDRS field test)Original
- S-CPRT-YTCPRT YouTube channel, URC 2017 CDR, SAR 2018, SAR 2019, SAR 2024 (5:07), SAR 2025 (4:57), "CPRT URC System Acceptance ReviewPrint copy